Higher Learning
Friday, May 12th, 2006If you?¢‚Ǩ‚Ñ¢ve already read the weekly features on our main page chances are you stumbled across the ?¢‚Ǩ?ìFrom the Vault,?¢‚Ǩ¬ù piece on Susan Glover and Arthur Holden?¢‚Ǩ‚Ñ¢s lo-fi but none-the-less massively entertaining short doc ?¢‚Ǩ?ìPhilosopher Stoned.?¢‚Ǩ¬ù Arthur of course is the stoned philosopher himself and he was only too happy to donate a few moments of his time to answer a few questions about the film. His answers like the drug the film centers around may make you a bit giggly.
Doc: Where did the initial concept of the film come from and was it always
intended as a film project or just an experiment?
Arthur: Susan and I were working together on a comedy short called “Three’s a Crowd”, which we were going to submit to a local short-short (max. 6 minutes) film festival. It was the end of the summer of 2003. My 15-year-old son Jacob had just spent his entire vacation hanging out with friends and getting blazed way more regularly than I was comfortable with. We had this borrowed video camera, and the idea came to us of doing an interview film in which I talked about my feelings toward weed… then smoked the stuff. Originally it was just an experiment. We were hoping we’d get something we could turn into a second film for the festival - but we weren’t really sure what we’d end up with. As soon as we shot it, though, we knew we had something potentially more interesting than a short-short piece. We cut it in the most effective way we could. And the result was Philosopher Stoned.
Doc: Has the film screened anywhere or been seen by an audience
before? If so what was their reaction to it?
A: Philosopher Stoned has never been shown publicly except on the Documentary Channel. But we did use the raw footage to cut a 6-minute piece (entitled “Joint Venture”) for the short-short festival. It was screened once, in front of a couple of hundred people - and they loved it. Laughed and cheered. The judges didn’t give us any prizes, though. Technical merit counted for a lot at this festival. I was very bitter about that. Susan said I should get a life.
Doc: In the film you mention that your own son had used marijuana before has he seen the film if so what was his reaction to it?
A: Good question. I didn’t tell him about the film before shooting it, or for a few months after it was cut. Both Susan and Jacob’s mother said I owed it to him (and myself) to let him see it. Eventually, over the Christmas holidays, I gave him a copy. He didn’t like it at all. But he was 15 at the time. If you’d shown me a film of my father getting stoned when I was 15, I’m not sure I’d have liked it either. (By the way, Jacob is 18 now, studying social sciences at a local college. He still smokes weed… but less.)
Doc: Any plans for a sequel? The Stoned Philosopher goes on a Trip perhaps?
A: Susan and I have talked to some friends about shooting a group version of Philosopher. It would be kind of like Jon Favreau’s Dinner for Five, minus famous people, plus marijuana. But we haven’t gotten past the planning stage.
Doc: Have you any other documentary projects in the works?
A: No documentaries, but a possible dramatic feature. I’ve written a screenplay entitled “The End of Marriage” about a family that comes under strain, in part because there’s a teenager in the mix, smoking dope. I’d like to do it with the same low-tech (though maybe not quite so low) ethic as Philosopher. Susan and a great Montreal actor named Mark Camacho would star as the troubled parents. If I can find the time and financing, we’ll shoot it this summer.
So that’s that. And it’s definitely not that last you’ll be hearing from Arthur as he’s already agreed to take part in an interview for an up coming Doc Channel Podcast.
Posted in DOC Blog | 47 Comments »